[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spamd, greylisting and bad MTA's
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: spamd, greylisting and bad MTA's
- From: Fabio Olive Leite <fabio_(_dot_)_olive_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:24:07 -0300
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:20:30PM +0200, Rickard Borgmdster wrote:
> What will happen if I cvs update my src tree afterwards? Will my src stay
> 3.6-stable while sources in libexec/spamd/ stay "current"?
You can go to spamd's directory and issue:
cvs update -r 1.74 spamd.c
This will stick only your spamd.c to this version, while the rest
stays stuck wherever they are, like OPENBSD_3_6.
It will not contaminate other files, and you are not going to venture
into -current, don't worry about that.
I drowned in the universal pool of entropy
Eris has saved me, and she has set me free
SED LEX AWK YACC, E PLURIBUS UNIX, AMEM
Visit your host, monkey.org