[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: End-to-End IPsec Tunnels
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: End-to-End IPsec Tunnels
- From: jared r r spiegel <jrrs_(_at_)_ice-nine_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:09:30 -0600
- Mail-followup-to: jared r r spiegel <jrrs_(_at_)_ice-nine_(_dot_)_org>, misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:00:35PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> that angle there makes me lean toward the TRANSPORT (again, not that
> i think transport vs. tunnel are going to be the make-or-break here),
> but i would also think that TRANSPORT... well, hell, RFC1827:
<snip>
found that RFC 2406, 3.1 has a very nice easy to digest with
ascii art explanation of the difference between tunnel and transport.
Visit your host, monkey.org