[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool vs. -lresolv
- To: ports_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: libtool vs. -lresolv
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf_(_dot_)_Wildenhues_(_at_)_gmx_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:37:02 +0100
- Organization: Department of Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn
* Thorsten Glaser wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:10:09PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues dixit:
> >The patch is fine as a workaround for above. But regarding upstream
> >libtool, I'd rather like the fix be done in the right place, in KDEs
> It's not only KDE which barfs at it. Things get worse when you also
> have a dummy libdl (libdl functions are in libc), which - out of a
> sudden - unbreaks lots of stuff which just refuses to build e.g. mo-
> dules without a libdl existing.
> It may be a workaround, but it's an effective one.
Hmm, yes, I see the point in fixing it in one place. OTOH, the
AC_SEARCH_LIBS one does not have to be adapted for other systems --
do other BSD systems have a stub libresolv?
Maybe we should have a variable to set in libtool.m4 with a list of
libraries to skip, to stop ltmain from getting messier.
Visit your host, monkey.org