[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
- To: source-changes_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
- From: Christopher Turan <turan_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 23:57:21 -0700 (MST)
- Reply-to: Christopher Turan <turan_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: ports
Changes by: turan_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org 2000/02/12 23:57:21
Modified files:
security/ssh : Makefile
Log message:
comflicting views regarding NONE license. Is a patch that has no license.
Who says no license is restrictive all the time? This port is the
perfect example of why license types should not even be looked at to
determine distribution.
Visit your host, monkey.org