Re: We are violating RFC1884 and RFC2373

[Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdtech_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:12:50PM -0700, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
> By your argument, djdns is not a DNS server because it doesn't
> support certain DNS (er, ipv6 related RR) RFCs.

This is simply wrong. djbdns supports _every_ kind of RR, in contrast to
bind. you may have to code them numeric in the data file, though.

> Since the code is there, yeah, a sysctl for those that insist
> would quench the noise.

This would be the best solution IMHO. we can default it to off tp prevent
broken access controls to be overridden.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, hostmaster_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de, http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany               *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)