[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An experimental patching framework...

To: tech_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: An experimental patching framework...
From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr_(_at_)_clipper_(_dot_)_net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 17:57:43 -0700

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 09:04:37PM +0200, Denis A. Doroshenko wrote:
> 
> yes, i mean it. but for producing binary patches i'd  rather use stable
> CVS branch.

This is not so much a question about binary patches, rather, a question
on the best method to update OpenBSD.  

The method I developed really just compares distribution tarballs
(release(8)).  

<jakemsr_(_at_)_clipper_(_dot_)_net> 
<jakemsr_(_at_)_jakemsr_(_dot_)_com>

References:
- Re: An experimental patching framework...
  - From: Jacob Meuser

Prev by Date: Winbond ethernet driver, Compex RL100-ATX 10/100, TXA9883 chipset , OpenBSD 2.9
Next by Date: Sudo(8) and fdesc don't get along
Previous by thread: Re: An experimental patching framework...
Next by thread: kernel option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org