salto mortale

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

ON THE [SF] CHRON

Overheard [in comments]:
But the Hearst owned Chronicle has historically veered as close to the right as they possibly could, without pissing off the natives. The tories who sold them the paper did likewise. What adds insult to injury, as far as I'm concerned, is that they're the only game in town, and they're chickenshit to the core. They scream poverty, yet publish a paper geared toward Arkansas shitkickers. They could make money hand over fist if they wrote for the people of this area. But with owners like Hearst, that's a pipe dream.

Don't get me wrong- there is real talent that writes for that rag. The aforementioned gentlemen [Matier and Ross]; the great columnist, Jon Carrol; and a sportwriting lineup that is as good as it gets. But the reactionary whiphand that drives the paper will never change.
It's a crappy, crappy newspaper, unfortunately. The only thing I'd disagree with above is about the "sportswriting": it's ungodly bad. I like Carroll though.



who salto?
what salto?
where salto?
when salto?
why salto?

site feed

hosted by
monkey

eek eek

powered by blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Creative Commons License

September 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008