From: owner-ceremony-digest@monkey.org (ceremony-digest) To: ceremony-digest@monkey.org Subject: ceremony-digest V2003 #45 Reply-To: ceremony@monkey.org Sender: owner-ceremony-digest@monkey.org Errors-To: owner-ceremony-digest@monkey.org Precedence: bulk ------- + Ceremony list web page: http://www.monkey.org/~laps/ceremony/ + See the above site for subscribing/unsubscribing and back issues. ------- ceremony-digest Wednesday, August 27 2003 Volume 2003 : Number 045 (Fac33) Re: ceremony-digest V2003 #44 RE: (Fac33) Re: ceremony-digest V2003 #44 (Fac33) john denver >Subject: (Fac33) Saville CD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:50:25 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Tim=20Jauncey?= Subject: (Fac33) Re: ceremony-digest V2003 #44 You'd have loved the Denver 1987 show then - everything sequencer-based fell apart a la JD Preston, and they ended up changing the set and doing a load of guitar stuff instead. >------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:07:19 +0100 From: Brian McGee Subject: (Fac33) New Order Looking at the Reading video, and how clearly little of World In Motion was actually *played*, I've often wondered what it would be like to hear a recording of a New Order gig from the desk, with the sequenced/pre-recorded material turned down to zero? Some of the tracks would be intersting.... - ------------------------------ ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:31:58 +0100 From: Brian McGee Subject: RE: (Fac33) Re: ceremony-digest V2003 #44 > > Sounds good. > > I've no doubt they're well able to play a lot without the backing and > sequencers, but it'd be funny to hear the tracks that *use* > that stuff, > without them! > > Brian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Jauncey [mailto:timjauncey@yahoo.com] > > Sent: 20 August 2003 13:50 > > To: ceremony@monkey.org > > Subject: (Fac33) Re: ceremony-digest V2003 #44 > > > > > > You'd have loved the Denver 1987 show then - > > everything sequencer-based fell apart a la JD Preston, > > and they ended up changing the set and doing a load of > > guitar stuff instead. > > > > >------------------------------ > > > > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:07:19 +0100 > > From: Brian McGee > > Subject: (Fac33) New Order > > > > Looking at the Reading video, and how clearly little > > of World In Motion > > was > > actually *played*, I've often wondered what it would > > be like to hear a > > recording of a New Order gig from the desk, with the > > sequenced/pre-recorded > > material turned down to zero? Some of the tracks > > would be > > intersting.... > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > __________ > > Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the > FREE Yahoo! > > Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/ > > ------- > > + Ceremony mailing list web page: > > http://www.monkey.org/~laps/ceremony/ > > + To talk to a person, send mail to . > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:04:12 EDT From: GaoBest@aol.com Subject: (Fac33) john denver I have this show (Aug 16 '87???) on tape, and I think the same guy taped the '85 show. I barely remember hearing it, though :/ Got it in '94 or so. x Mike In a message dated 8/20/03 5:51:08 AM, timjauncey@yahoo.com writes: << You'd have loved the Denver 1987 show then - everything sequencer-based fell apart a la JD Preston, and they ended up changing the set and doing a load of guitar stuff instead. >> ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 20:41:52 +0200 From: "Mick Aneworderfan" Subject: >Subject: (Fac33) Saville CD >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:04:49 +0100 >From: daniel.butt@keble.ox.ac.uk >Subject: (Fac33) Saville CD > >Has anyone got the soundtrack CD to the Peter >Saville exhibition yet? What's it like? Do we know if >they're definitely in stock at the exhibition? I think I'm >going on Friday. *Sorry for the late reply... been very busy, you know... it's absolutely excellent, much much better than Elegia and Avalanche, it's the first truly wonderful instrumental track New Order have ever made. They must be proud they have done a job at the level of Brian Eno, the instrumentation is wonderful, the melody is fabulous, I like the way it flows, it's really relaxing and yet emotional... it's perfect as the soundtrack for a show, especially Saville's, it's generally perfect as background music. Of course you can't listen to the whole half hour every time as with a four minutes pop song (I mean paying the same attention), but you hardly get tired of having it as background atmosphere... just try while you're at your computer, or while driving (if not sleepy, if sleepy you better play stuff like Fine Time...). It's just perfect for what it's made for. mick: mick973@email.it aneworderfan blog: http://aneworderfan.blogspot.com - -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Interessi alti, massima libertà. È Conto Arancio di ING Direct. Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=660&d=27-8 ------------------------------ End of ceremony-digest V2003 #45 ******************************** ------- + For information on subscribing/unsubscribing and the digest archives, + see the Ceremony web page: http://www.monkey.org/~laps/ceremony/ + To talk to a person, send mail to .