dialup sucks but wireless improves it
This page last updated 20020303 (initial
posting)
Long, rambly introduction.
The joys and woes of dialup access are disappearing (slowly) and that's
mostly a good thing. However, they're not yet disappearing for me, because
I'm not yet settled enough in any one city to really justify the hassle of
a broadband connection in my name. This page is about reducing the woes by
at least cutting the cord between modem and computer, or at the very least
making it an ethernet cable rather than a phoneline.
But first, the Woes, which are mostly obvious:
- Dialup is slow (but see below, too).
- It's not always on -- This means that if you want to check email,
get a set of directions, a recipe, or the local weather-by-zipcode, and
you're not already connected, you have to wait for the dueling modems to
shriek at each other. If it's something small you want, you may not even
bother checking it, and that's a shame when such information is easily
available.
- Dueling modems, shrieking at each other. This is how the banshees
sound, or the Nazgul.
- Related to that (but not identical), most dialup access means tying
up the only available phone line, the same one you might like to use to
take voice calls, order pizza, receive faxes, etc.
- Dialup requires a modem. Obvious, but an annoyance. Many low-end PCs
come with finicky WinModems which are useless once a Unix or Unix-like
operating system has been installed. (Yes, other networking methods also
require some hardware, but this is about dialup and its
particularities!)
- A modem (at least by itself -- keep reading) requires you to be tied
to a phone line. Many phone lines are arranged specifically to
inconvenience anyone who would like to use them, so I have gotten used to
carrying a length of it around, but even that doesn't help much when the
jacks are inaccessable. Besides, that 50-foot length I have at home is
pretty bulky to carry around, string around furniture, etc. Those little
springtabs are easy to break, too. (Why are phone cords not hooded, like
quality ethernet cables are?)
And the Joys? There are a lot of places in 2002 America where dialup is
the only alternative, so might as well find *some* joy in it.
Accordingly:
- When you're desperate for it, even that piercing, braying scream can
sound pretty nice.
- In the continental U.S., hone lines are everywhere, and most people
have very cheap local service. If you're visiting a friend and need to
check email urgently, he can probably let you tie up his phone line for a
quick local call if there's no other net access.
- 56K isn't that bad. I've actually had some very good dialup
connections (in the 48-51K range), and for much of the best stuff on the
internet, anything over 9600 is sufficient for happy access, even if more
is better. Read with a threshold of 2 or higher, even Slashdot is OK over
dialup, and google shows off how a good site should act. Dialup is not the
best way to download new movie trailers, but it works just dandy to check
email with Pine, use IRC, etc.
- You don't need a new service contract to cross the country. If you
move -- of if you're just staying in a fine motel like The Six -- and have an account with one
of the large ISPs (Earthlink, MSNBC, AT&T, UUNet, AOL), and are in local
calling range of a dialup access point, you're set. Not quite that simple
(since it may take a while in the voice-menu muck to find an access
number), but I've had success this way calling from deepest Little Rock to
the wilds of New Jersey. There are, however, places where even the
supposedly nationwide ISPs fall down, affording *not a single local
access number for Mindspring or AOL.* West Memphis, Arkansas, for instance
(as of late 2001.) Right now, I'm carrying a phone card good for more than
8 hours of long distance, and hope I don't have to use it.
Now the short real story:
Being tied to a phone cord when dialed up is a pain. I wanted something
similar in functionality to the Apple Airport, but without certain of its
drawbacks: that is, I wanted a wireless access point with a modem, so I
could (for instance) check into a hotel / motel with free local calls,
dial up an ISP, and if the angle is right, maybe go eat a waffle at the
restaurant across the street while online. The problem is, the Airport is
finicky to set up (there's a Java setup tool if you don't want to use a
Macintosh OS to do the setup, but not a browser interface) and though not
badly priced for all it includes, slightly expensive in absolute terms
(around $320 including TN sales tax). The Airport also does not include a
3- or 4-port switch as many current WAPs do (though the new Airport model
can be used in combination with an external box, acting as a DHCP server
for all the connected machines), and I really liked this feature on my old
Linksys box. (I also think the Airport is ugly, but there's no accounting
for taste.)
So, the goal in shorter form: a nicely portable, switch-included,
easy-to-administer, inexpensive, DCHP-serving, modem-included wireless
access box. The result I came up with is not particularly pretty and not
as well-integrated as I would like (later revisions may improve both of
these failings), but is easy to assemble, flexible in operation, and beats
the Airport in price, although not by much. (It could have been done a
lot cheaper, though.)
The guts:
- SMC Barricade
7004AWBR, which includes a 4-port switch and a printer port. The shape
makes it impossible (or at least difficult) to stack the modem directly
atop the AP, which is what I would prefer to do, and which would allow a
more compact overall result. Other than that, the ergonomics are fine and
the whole thing feels well-constructed, much better than certain SMC
devices I looked at a few years ago and decided against. The wallwart,
however, is ugly and awkward.) Most imporantly, though, the Barricade has
a serial port and a built-in modem-control capability, which no other
wireless box I've seen does. $220, retail price. Smarter and more patient
people than me will get it for $150 by haunting pricewatch and paying
attention to sales, or hitting eBay.
- Cheap generic (well, CompUSA-branded outside but basically unlabeled)
56K modem. Fearing Dr. Murphy, on the same shopping trip I also paid $15
for a US Robotics 33.6 external modem from Computer Renaissance, but have
not had to resort to it. (Sad truth: in Fountain City, TN the phone lines
aren't worth anything higher than 33.6 anyhow.) This modem has an ugly,
unlabeled wallwart. (I have added a label myself now, lest it one day join
my collection of orphaned AC adapters). $50, more than I expected generic
modems to cost now, but reasonable compared to most other modems I've
purchased in my life on a bit/dollar basis. Online, workable eternal 56K
modems can be had for $30 (including shipping).
- 25' thin-line phonecord from CVS. The thin stuff seems to work well, and
saves considerably on bulk $5.
- phone-cord coupler ($5), and a 6-foot length of additional phonecord
(free). Better safe than sorry -- phoneline couplers are a great
invention, because often additional *lengths* of cord are available, just
not your target distance, but without a coupler, they're unuseable except
one at a time.
- 14' CAT5 cable - probably from a desperation run to RadioShack last
year. $10
- 6' CAT5 cable (came with the Barricade)
- one scavenged cheap black plastic case, I think originally meant to hold
emergency supples for the car, flares, etc.
- one used T-shirt, used to pad the electronics from the case. Will
probably replace this with some scavenged foam cut to snugly hold the
parts inside the case.
Total outlay for the non-scavenged parts: $290. (For the patient / smart,
could be done for closer to $180, certainly under $200.) The extra $90 is
my Stupidity Tax (or "Impatience Fee" if you're nice.).
I semi-artfully arranged the named parts into the cheap black case. The
result feels surprisingly sturdy, not rattly (though I will improve the
makeshift padding soon, and provide a hard flat surface to discourage
overheating of the SMC box), and can be set up in under a minute of
plugging in the two horrible wallwarts and connecting a computer by
wireless (or ethernet).
Once set up (Using the excellent web interface of the Barricade, I
selected dial-up as my primary means of connection, entered my local
dialup number, and set it to auto-connect; I didn't need to mess around
with the modem's initialization string or anything else), the system just
works. It is ugly, no doubt, but to me not as ugly as the
coneheads-spaceship look of the Airport. Besides which, the non-descript
case may be an advantage in certain circumstances. (This box has a lot of
great features -- port forwarding, firewalling, etc -- intended for
broadband sharing which I'm ignoring for now, but will examine more
closely when I actually get beefier connection.)
Whatever company finally puts together the booming wireless AP/ internet
sharing / firewall market with the fact that most Internet-connected
Americans still rely on POTS for their fix will clean up. A year from now
at latest, I expect to see less-ugly boxes from SMC, Linksys or others
which actually do all this is a better-looking, more compact box, one
which need be no larger than any of the current crop of broadband-routers
-- basically, what I'd like to see is a Linksys
BEFW11S4 with a built-in v92 modem. That would be easier to carry
around than this Frankenmodem -- CompUSA will immediately sell out, and in
3 months they'll cost $180 at Walmart. Hey, what are they waiting for?
Thanks to Alex Porras and Steve Killen for recommending the SMC
barricade, and convincing me that SMC products weren't necessarily going
to drive me insane.
All contents copyright 1996-2002, T. Lord / timothy@monkey.org / Go home.